dumb people
you people are dumb if you think the teacher is right. the student had it right
Chris
To simply put it, the kid was right. If the question said, cut two pieces off a board and it took ten minutes.. well then yes it's 5 min a cut.. but the question clearly doesn't say cut two pieces off. it states saw a board into two pieces.. That's only 1 cut in 10 min, 3 pieces 2 cuts 20 min.. So "Gofigure" apparently it is rocket science for you. You always have one more then the number of cuts, as you get to count the piece of wood your cutting.
elevenses9s11sHs5s11
Nope, "i" think the teacher is correct, if you divide 10/2 = 5 minutes for each piece, but looks like it is a tricky question [:confused:]
Sefa
ahhhhh..... [:confused:]
Nick
GO Figure!
Marie did not cut two boards.. Only one :)) [:rolleyes:]
PATRICIA MENDES
ALL 1M GUN@ S@Y 1Z D@ T3@CH3R IZ 31TH3R SL0W 0R @N 1D10T
one engineer
guys I made a lot of money by correcting the mistakes of my professor from university..that idiot consulted a lot of treatment plants and always made same mistake..so simply I followed his projects [:lol:]
Elias
GO Figure!
U'r more stupid than the teacher.
u'r more like an ASSHOLE [:evil:]
Sufyan
hehehehe
WTF!!! [:eek:]
gigogagerk
Yeah the student was right... sawing in 2 pieces means sawing it in half. if you're making it into 3 pieces then it takes double the time.
GoFigure!
actually, the teacher's point of view is:
10 minutes = 2 pcs. (that means Marie took 5 minutes to cut each piece)
so LOGICALLY, if it takes her 5 minutes to cut each piece:
15 minutes = 3 pcs. @5 mins. each piece
[:wink:] it's not rocket science.
murtuza ali
what the heck? [:wink:]
Josh
Whoever said "wtf thats correct" just earned some stupid points in my book.
2 pieces = 1 cut = 10 minutes
3 pieces = 2 cuts = 20 minutes
It's not minutes/piece, it's a minutes/cut equation. The teacher's a dolt.
lali
If that was a teacher that is sad. The question is not meant to trick you so they mean that the pieces will be sawed the same way. To make a board in 2 pieces is one cut that took 10 minutes. To saw a second board with similar cuts which would be two cuts would be 10 x 2 = 20. That person was wrong to make it incorrect. The poor student was right. So sad! [:sad:]
russ
depends on how you cut it.
no
wtf thats correct
Santhanam
[:biggrin:]
Really stupid.....
Kiki
Go figure
lol man, it doesnt take 5 min to cut each piece, only 1 cut and u have 2 pieces lol
but maybe u cut board 2 times to get in in half
lol...
the comment are funnier...
not 3 star question.. 5 star..
Laurent
So it will take 5 minutes to cut it in 1 piece
ROFL
Tyrone
Dumbass whore bitch teacher (assuming she's a female).
You make ONE cut in 10 minutes and have two pieces.
You make TWO cuts and have how many pieces? Three, right? So 2 x 10 = 20.
CUNT!
sixo
and they wonder why i dropped out of school.. sheesh
Lyn
The problem is done correctly.. -____-
[:confused:]
1Caractere
GoFigure!
Look at the picture. It doesn't reflect your analogy at all. Like you said, it's not rocket science. You missed the correct answer by a mile. [:rolleyes:]
Clearly you don't design rockets, do you?
Facebook
Twitter
dumb people
you people are dumb if you think the teacher is right. the student had it right
Chris
To simply put it, the kid was right. If the question said, cut two pieces off a board and it took ten minutes.. well then yes it's 5 min a cut.. but the question clearly doesn't say cut two pieces off. it states saw a board into two pieces.. That's only 1 cut in 10 min, 3 pieces 2 cuts 20 min.. So "Gofigure" apparently it is rocket science for you. You always have one more then the number of cuts, as you get to count the piece of wood your cutting.
elevenses9s11sHs5s11
Nope, "i" think the teacher is correct, if you divide 10/2 = 5 minutes for each piece, but looks like it is a tricky question [:confused:]
Sefa
ahhhhh..... [:confused:]
Nick
GO Figure! Marie did not cut two boards.. Only one :)) [:rolleyes:]
PATRICIA MENDES
ALL 1M GUN@ S@Y 1Z D@ T3@CH3R IZ 31TH3R SL0W 0R @N 1D10T
one engineer
guys I made a lot of money by correcting the mistakes of my professor from university..that idiot consulted a lot of treatment plants and always made same mistake..so simply I followed his projects [:lol:]
Elias
GO Figure! U'r more stupid than the teacher. u'r more like an ASSHOLE [:evil:]
Sufyan
hehehehe WTF!!! [:eek:]
gigogagerk
Yeah the student was right... sawing in 2 pieces means sawing it in half. if you're making it into 3 pieces then it takes double the time.
GoFigure!
actually, the teacher's point of view is: 10 minutes = 2 pcs. (that means Marie took 5 minutes to cut each piece) so LOGICALLY, if it takes her 5 minutes to cut each piece: 15 minutes = 3 pcs. @5 mins. each piece [:wink:] it's not rocket science.
murtuza ali
what the heck? [:wink:]
Josh
Whoever said "wtf thats correct" just earned some stupid points in my book. 2 pieces = 1 cut = 10 minutes 3 pieces = 2 cuts = 20 minutes It's not minutes/piece, it's a minutes/cut equation. The teacher's a dolt.
lali
If that was a teacher that is sad. The question is not meant to trick you so they mean that the pieces will be sawed the same way. To make a board in 2 pieces is one cut that took 10 minutes. To saw a second board with similar cuts which would be two cuts would be 10 x 2 = 20. That person was wrong to make it incorrect. The poor student was right. So sad! [:sad:]
russ
depends on how you cut it.
no
wtf thats correct
Santhanam
[:biggrin:] Really stupid.....
Kiki
Go figure lol man, it doesnt take 5 min to cut each piece, only 1 cut and u have 2 pieces lol but maybe u cut board 2 times to get in in half
lol...
the comment are funnier... not 3 star question.. 5 star..
Laurent
So it will take 5 minutes to cut it in 1 piece ROFL
Tyrone
Dumbass whore bitch teacher (assuming she's a female). You make ONE cut in 10 minutes and have two pieces. You make TWO cuts and have how many pieces? Three, right? So 2 x 10 = 20. CUNT!
sixo
and they wonder why i dropped out of school.. sheesh
Lyn
The problem is done correctly.. -____- [:confused:]
1Caractere
GoFigure! Look at the picture. It doesn't reflect your analogy at all. Like you said, it's not rocket science. You missed the correct answer by a mile. [:rolleyes:] Clearly you don't design rockets, do you?